The Targeting of Uyghur Muslims in China (UK)

Use the Guardian video Why more than 1 million Uyghurs are being held in camps in China (5:03) to provide your students with an overview of the human rights crisis in Xinjiang. (Note: This video makes a brief reference to forced sterilisations and torture that have occurred in the detention centres. It is important to preview resources to ensure they are appropriate for your students.)

After showing the video, use these questions to check for understanding and guide a class discussion:

1. Who are the Uyghur people?
2. How does the Chinese government use policing and surveillance to control the Uyghur people? 
   • How might excessive policing and surveillance impact a community?
3. What have Uyghur people experienced or witnessed in the camps? 
   • What does the Chinese government claim happens in the camps? 

In A Uyghur Teen’s Life After Escaping Genocide, an episode of The Experiment podcast, Aséna Tahir Izgil recounts why she and her family decided to flee Xinjiang and what it has been like for her living in the United States since. Play two clips of the episode for your students, from 1:05–4:45 and from 14:30–19:20.

Then, ask your students to reflect on Aséna’s story in small groups, using the Head, Heart, Conscience strategy:

Head:

1. How did Aséna and her family’s life at home change as the Chinese government implemented stricter controls?
2. How did her experience at school change?
3. What questions do you still have about the situation in Xinjiang?

Heart:

1. What emotions does Aséna’s story raise for you?
2. What aspect of her story stands out to you the most and why?

Conscience:

1. In her story, Aséna tells of different types of "education." How is the kind of education Aséna and her classmates received in her story about her biology teacher different from the kind of education the Chinese government says it’s providing in the camps? 
   • What might be the impact of each type of education on individuals? 
   • On society?
2. What questions about right or wrong, fairness or injustice, does Aséna’s story raise for you?

Share with your students that governments that have recognised the atrocities occurring against the Uyghur people as a genocide and/or as crimes against humanity have responded in a number of ways, including by imposing sanctions on Chinese government officials who are involved and by diplomatically boycotting the Beijing Olympics that took place in February 2022. In December 2021, the United States government passed legislation that banned the importation of any goods from Xinjiang unless companies can prove that they were not produced using forced labour. Then, in September 2022, the United Nations published a report stating that China may have committed crimes against humanity in Xinjiang.

Read and discuss the following passages that describe some aspects of the international response together as a class:

Discuss with your students:

1. Excerpt from Olympic Boycotts in History: From Moscow to Beijing (Teen Vogue):

   
   Throughout Olympic history, there have been extensive discussions about athlete participation and boycotts. At the 1936 Berlin Games, now widely referred to as the “Nazi Olympics,” spectators at the Games gave the Nazi salute as the swastika flag flew high. As German Olympian and sports studies scholar Arnd Krüger wrote in The Nazi Olympics, “The 1936 Olympics consolidated Hitler’s popularity at home and with German-speaking people abroad. The absence of any serious boycott and a virtually incident-free running of the Games led Germans to believe that their new regime was universally admired.”

   [...]

   “With the Nazi Games, there was this very political—and public—conversation around it,” Amira Rose Davis, assistant professor of history and African American studies at Penn State University and cohost of the feminist sports podcast Burn It All Down, tells Teen Vogue. The question was: If athletes participated, would that validate the Nazi regime? “Some people [said] no, it's better to go and dominate than to not participate,” she explains, pointing to Jesse Owens, a Black American athlete, who won four gold medals in Berlin. Others, including Jewish athletes, chose to boycott.

2. Excerpt from How much does the diplomatic boycott of Beijing 2022 matter? (BBC):

   The venue for the 2022 Winter Olympics [in Beijing] [was] hit by a flurry of diplomatic boycotts from countries including the US, Australia, and Britain, because of widespread allegations of Chinese atrocities against the Uyghur community . . .

   
   While the coalition of Tibetan, Uyghur, Southern Mongolian, Hong Kong, and Taiwanese rights groups that [made] up the #NoBeijing2022 campaign welcomed the diplomatic boycotts, many campaigners [felt] they [did] not go far enough, and that athletes themselves, corporate sponsors and major broadcasters also need[ed] to act if pressure really [was] to be brought to bear on China . . .
   
   Some ask[ed] - if a full boycott is not appropriate now, in a country that stands accused of genocide, when will it ever be? . . .
   
   Refusing to participate in the Olympics would perhaps [have done] more to raise awareness of the violations that China stands accused of, and taking part risks appearing complicit - but it would also [have] seem[ed] very unfair on innocent athletes who . . .  spent years preparing for such an opportunity.

    

3. Overview on Forced Labour in Xinjiang

   
   A 2019 report estimates that at least 100,000 Uyghur people and other minorities in Xinjiang are being forced to perform labour against their will. Xinjiang produces important raw materials, including around 22% of all cotton grown worldwide. Several prominent global brands, including Adidas, Coca-Cola, and Nike, have used components that were produced through forced labour in Xinjiang. 

   In the UK, the Modern Slavery Act 2015 contains a section on Transparency in Supply Chains that requires certain commercial organisations to ‘publish an annual statement setting out the steps they take to prevent modern slavery in their business and their supply chains’. However, the World Uyghur Congress is taking the UK authorities to court over the fact they have not suspended the importation of products containing Xinjiang cotton that has been produced in whole or in part by forced labourers. 

   In the US, it is illegal to import goods that were made by forced labour, but US customs officials have to provide evidence that forced labour was involved in creating the goods in order to ban them, which can be difficult to find. However, in December 2021, the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act was passed, which means that the US government will assume that all goods made in Xinjiang involve forced labour, unless a company can prove otherwise. This shifts the burden of proof to companies, and legislators hope that it will be more effective at preventing the sale of goods that involve forced labour in Xinjiang in the United States.

Discuss with your students:

1. Do other governments have the responsibility to act in some way to protect the Uyghur people? Why or why not?
   • What message can a diplomatic boycott of an Olympic event send to the world? What are its limitations?
   • What other actions can governments take to make a difference?
2. Do private companies have a responsibility to ensure that their supply chains do not involve forced labour? Why or why not?
   • What actions can private companies take to make a difference?
3. Do individuals have the responsibility to act in some way to protect the Uyghur people? Why or why not?
   • What actions can individuals with a public platform take to make a difference?
   • What actions can individual consumers take to make a difference?

For more information on the history and use of the term genocide, read Facing History’s resource Raphael Lemkin and the Genocide Convention with your students. Students can discuss the connection questions that follow the reading and then consider why it matters that some countries are labelling the targeting of Uyghur people by the Chinese government in Xinjiang as genocide.

Ask students to listen to a longer portion of The Experiment podcast episode A Uyghur Teen’s Life After Escaping Genocide (from 1:05 - 39:00) and to read The Atlantic article One by One, My Friends Were Sent to the Camps, written by Tahir Hamut Izgil, a Uyghur poet and Aséna Tahir Izgil’s father (if you have limited class time, you might ask students to do this initial work as homework). After engaging with these sources, they should reflect in their journals using the Head, Heart, Conscience questions from this activity.